On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Antti Palosaari crope@iki.fi wrote:
On 07/24/2012 11:11 PM, Devin Heitmueller wrote:
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Rémi Denis-Courmont remi@remlab.net wrote:
If it's of interest to anyone, I could probably present a bunch of issues with V4L2 and DVB from userspace perspective.
Remi,
I would strongly be in favor of this. One thing that we get far to little of is feedback from actual userland developers making use of the V4L and DVB interfaces (aside from the SoC vendors, which is a completely different target audience than the traditional V4L and DVB consumers)
I wonder if it is wise to merge both DVB and V4L2 APIs, add needed DVB stuff to V4L2 API and finally remove whole DVB API. V4L2 API seems to be much more feature rich, developed more actively and maybe has less problems than current DVB API.
lets never do that.